Immigration Law of Canada Samples †MyAssignmenthelp.com

Question: Discuss about the Immigration Law of Canada. Answer: This letter is in reference to claim of Refugee and protection status in Canada with respect toCanadian law governed by the government of Canada. Convention refugees are individuals who are outside their home country in which their normally reside and they are not able to return to their nation due to a well-founded fear of persecution based on political opinion, religion, race, nationality or membership in a particular social group (Olsen and et.al, 2016). These individuals require protection in Canada because they are subjected to the threat of torture, the risk of their life or any cruel punishment or treatment. I want to claim for Refugee and protection status due to increased threat of torture, the risk to my life and associated individuals. I am attacked by Skinhead organisation on several occasions. Further, my brother disappeared in a raid, and a few days later he body was found. Police are also not assisting us due to discrimination. My family had also received threating notes that like my brother that me and my family will also die if we do not leave. Canada has an agreement with the US in which the person who is willing to compose a refugee claim should perform in the initial safe country they reach. By considering this, if an individual arrives in Canada at the borderland from the US, from this they will not be able to make a refugee claim within Canada, but this rule is not applied in some cases, for instance, if an individual has its family living in Canada. According to this agreement, claimants of refuge must ask for the protection of refugee in the initial safe country they reach, unless and until they are eligible for an immunity regarding the Agreement. In accordance with the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act, United States is the sole country which is elected as the third safe country by Canada. For rescue, me and my family travelled to the US and illegally entered in Canada due to extreme emergency and made a claim for refugee protection stating claims that they have been persecuted in Hungary due to their being a Roma. Due to the threat of life, we had not claimed against police and self-government was also ineffective (Garcea, 2017). The primary reason for not claiming in the US is that their relatives informed them that their stay in the country is irrelevant. Further, we were already threatened, so we are not in a condition to take such risk. In accordance with the Sec 170, Refugee Protection Division can proceed with the decision of evidence instead of getting bound by technical or legal rules of evidence (Bloom Udahemuka, 2014). Further, by considering the case of Thind v. Canada (Minister of Employment Immigration) presumption of truth can be applied as applicant swears to the truth by providing them with the benefit of the doubt. I do not have any nexus with the criminal background instead of facing severe issues of discrimination. Further, as per Canadian legal provisions, IRPA provides exception applied when an individual was Convention refugees, and in my case, there is a nexus between fear and ground contained in Refugee convention i.e. the threat of torture, the risk of their life or any cruel punishment or treatment (Barsky, 2017). We do not have availability of state protection as Alternative option on an internal flight in Budapest is not convenient because they do not know anyone in Budapest so initiating a new life at that place will be a difficult job as we need the emotional support of family. So you are kindly requested to provide me and my family status of Refugee and protection status. References Barsky, R. F. (2017).Arguing and justifying: assessing the Convention refugees' choice of moment, motive and host country. Taylor Francis law. Campbell, J. (2013). Language analysis in the United Kingdom's refugee status determination system: seeing through policy claims about expert knowledge.Ethnic and Racial Studies,36(4), 670-690. Bloom, A., Udahemuka, M. (2014). Going through the doors of pain: asylum seeker and Convention refugee experiences in Aotearoa New Zealand.Kotuitui: New Zealand Journal of Social Sciences Online,9(2), 70-81. Garcea, J. (2017). Canadas refugee protection system.Structural Context of Refugee Integration in Canada and Germany, 31. Olsen, C., El-Bialy, R., Mckelvie, M., Rauman, P., Brunger, F. (2016). Other Troubles: Deconstructing perceptions and changing responses to refugees in Canada.Journal of immigrant and minority health,18(1), 58-66.